Hi OpenSSL team, I'm not sure but this might be improving your documentation.
http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/BIO_push.html If the call: BIO_push(b64, f); is made then the new chain will be b64-chain. After making the calls shouldn't this be "b64-f" instead of "b64-chain"? Another one: BIO * BIO_push(BIO *b,BIO *append); The BIO_push() function appends the BIO append to b, it returns b. This is ok but for example in http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/BIO_f_base64.html the example looks like: BIO *bio, *b64; char message[] = "Hello World \n"; b64 = BIO_new(BIO_f_base64()); bio = BIO_new_fp(stdout, BIO_NOCLOSE); bio = BIO_push(b64, bio); ... >From a technical view this is ok because bio and b64 are both pointers of type >BIO but following the documentation of BIO_push it should look like this for better understanding: b64 = BIO_push(b64, bio); Maybe I'm wrong, regards. -Steffen -- Hermes powered by LFS SVN-20070420 (Linux 2.6.24-rc7) Best regards, Steffen Pankratz.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
