Great! Can you commit the mingw64 other stuff?
On 11/1/08, Andy Polyakov via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I managed to produce them myself with > >> mingw-w64-bin_x86-64-linux_20080921.tar.bz2. Modified sha512.c is fine, > > > > Great! > > My environment is gcc-4.3.2, binutils-CVS-head, mingw-w64-SVN-head as > > > 20080921 is equipped with gcc-4.4.0 and whatever the rest it is equipped > with. > > > >> modified bn_lcl.h gives ~2x improvement. All tests pass except for the > >> last Whirlpool test. It's a compiler bug, because if I drop optimization > >> level to -O1 when compiling wp_block.c, the test passes. > > > > Can you please send this hank as attachment? > > > http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17580. > > > >> Strangely enough the code in question is not compiled in VC-* build... > >> Basically there is no need for GetModuleHandle("avdapi32") and > >> consequent GetProcAddress calls, because the functions in question are > >> present on all WinNT *and* Win9x. On latter they do nothing, but they > >> are present, so that application won't suffer from startup errors if you > >> link them explicitly. > > > > So do we need it or don't we? > > > http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17583. A. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
