Stephen Henson via RT wrote: >> [philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com - Mon Mar 09 18:21:52 2009]: >> >> Stephen Henson via RT wrote: >>> There have been some concerns expressed in the mailing list about >> how >>> portable this is to the many version of 'make' it has to work with. >>> >>> Steve. >>> >> The '@' command for quiet has been standard in Make going back to (at >> least) 4.3BSD (circa 1983). >> >> It could always be bracketed by a test for non-compliant OSes... >> > > It's not the @ command which might be non-portable IMHO but the > expansion of $(Q) into @.
I guess I still don't understand the issue. On the platforms that don't support this, it could be left undefined or set to the empty string... -Philip ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
