Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > >>> [philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com - Mon Jan 26 12:04:34 2009]: >>> >>> The OCF code has been ported to Linux: >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=133575 >>> >>> >>> it would be very nice if this were supported in openssl without patching. >>> >>> For instance, crypto/engine/eng_all.c tests for: >>> >>> >>> #if defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) >>> >>> >>> but why not test for HAVE_CRYPTODEV instead, and allow this to be set by >>> the configuration environment? >>> >>> >> You should be able to set HAVE_CRYPTODEV in the configuration >> environment with the command line switch -DHAVE_CRYPTODEV . Is the above >> line the only case you need to patch? >> >> Steve. >> > > As far as I can tell, the files that conditionally expose "cryptodev" stuff > are: > > crypto/engine/eng_all.c > crypto/engine/engine.h > include/openssl/engine.h > libssl/crypto/evp/c_all.c > > and that's it. > > I'm attaching a copy of the patch we use on Linux and uClibc if anyone is > interested. > > -Philip > >
Didn't hear back. I responded on 03/09/2009. Should I repost this patch? I'm trying to figure out what you need from me to get movement on issues 1821, 1822, and 1823. Thanks, -Philip ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
