> [phil...@redfish-solutions.com - Mon Jun 29 22:11:12 2009]: > > Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > > Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > > > >>> [philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com - Mon Jan 26 12:04:34 2009]: > >>> > >>> The OCF code has been ported to Linux: > >>> > >>> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=133575 > >>> > >>> > >>> it would be very nice if this were supported in openssl without > patching. > >>> > >>> For instance, crypto/engine/eng_all.c tests for: > >>> > >>> > >>> #if defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) > >>> > >>> > >>> but why not test for HAVE_CRYPTODEV instead, and allow this to be > set by > >>> the configuration environment? > >>> > >>> > >> You should be able to set HAVE_CRYPTODEV in the configuration > >> environment with the command line switch -DHAVE_CRYPTODEV . Is the > above > >> line the only case you need to patch? > >> > >> Steve. > >> > > > > As far as I can tell, the files that conditionally expose > "cryptodev" stuff are: > > > > crypto/engine/eng_all.c > > crypto/engine/engine.h > > include/openssl/engine.h > > libssl/crypto/evp/c_all.c > > > > and that's it. > > > > I'm attaching a copy of the patch we use on Linux and uClibc if > anyone is interested. > > > > -Philip > > > > > > Didn't hear back. I responded on 03/09/2009. > > Should I repost this patch? I'm trying to figure out what you need > from > me to get movement on issues 1821, 1822, and 1823. >
This should be now included as part of the patch for PR#1974 -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
