Nothing serious, having fun. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Richard Levitte <[email protected]> wrote:
> In message <[email protected]> > on Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:30:22 +0300, Mike Pechkin <[email protected]> > said: > > mike.pechkin> I see the different ways how CRYPTO_w_lock used in md_rand.c > mike.pechkin> Patch against 0.9.8o in attach. > mike.pechkin> > mike.pechkin> Comments? Objections? > > Uhmmm, as far as I can see, your patch make no relevant change, > really. The sections the extra code is covering really calls nothing > else (except for a memcpy()), and particularly nothing that would come > close to calling ssleay_rand_add recursively, which would be the only > reason for your patch, as far as I can see. > > What are you really trying to solve? > > Cheers, > Richard > > -- > Richard Levitte [email protected] > http://richard.levitte.org/ > > "Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!" > -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish >
