On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Allan Clark wrote: > Logically, depending on where the API is stable/constant, the SONAME maybe > should be 1.0, with soft links from the libXX.so.1.0 -> libXX.so.1.0.1 .. I'm > referring to the old design where the filename/SONAME/softlink was > used/intended to allow some backward compatibility or bring in a shim. I > know we all know that, I'm mentioning it for the backing logic to my comment. > > Tim, what platform are you on? Is this behaviour common cross-target or only > Tim's platform?
I've only tried UnixWare, Solaris, OpenServer 5, & OSX Lion so far. All are 1.0.0 hence my post. -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 456-1146 [email protected] (707) 887-1469 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
