On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 08:11:30PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > It's unfortunate and should have been taken care of at 1.0.0 release. I > mean it should have been 1.0 or 10 or something. > > > I'd just like verification that this is intentional and we can expect > > binaries built against the 1.0.0 shared libs to run fine using the > > 1.0.1 shared libs. > > Incompatibilities will be treated as bugs, so I'd in fact encourage test > with binaries compiled with 1.0.0.
You might want to look at this report: http://www.upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/openssl/1.0.0g_to_1.0.1-beta2/abi_compat_report.html Kurt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
