> It's perplexing that it went unnoticed for this long. Is it possible > that problem was compensated for in specific linker patch-level or > something?
It could be. I'm building on an old HP/UX 11.11 machine with a fairly old toolchain, to ensure the resulting bits will work on a wide variety of environments. So you're right, maybe newer toolchains work around this. I've been using this environment for quite awhile without problems, but only recently upgraded it from OpenSSL 0.9.8y to the modern 1.X world. At least some of the parisc assembly seems to be new in that version. > Could you verify > http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=02450ec69dda7815ba1e7bd74eb30f0ae1eb3042 > that replaces bv only when build targets 64-bit mode? Once it's verified, it > goes down to 1.0.x. Looks good -- "openssl md5" and "make test" both work. Thanks! -Mitch ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
