>> It's perplexing that it went unnoticed for this long. Is it possible >> that problem was compensated for in specific linker patch-level or >> something? > > It could be. I'm building on an old HP/UX 11.11 machine with a fairly old > toolchain, to ensure the resulting bits will work on a wide variety of > environments. So you're right, maybe newer toolchains work around this. > > I've been using this environment for quite awhile without problems, but only > recently upgraded it from OpenSSL 0.9.8y to the modern 1.X world. At least > some of the parisc assembly seems to be new in that version. > >> Could you verify >> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=02450ec69dda7815ba1e7bd74eb30f0ae1eb3042 >> that replaces bv only when build targets 64-bit mode? Once it's verified, it >> goes down to 1.0.x. > > Looks good -- "openssl md5" and "make test" both work. Thanks!
Applied to 1.0.2 and 1.0.1. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
