On 1 July 2014 06:52, Zoltan Arpadffy <z...@polarhome.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I see that Rich is doing a fantastic job by cleaning up the backlog... > I absolutely agree that very old releases cannot be supported, but what about > the platforms? > > I thought until now, that as long there are developers who are willing to > develop for a certain platform and there is some community interest in using > that - the platform will be supported as odd might it be in the Windows and > Linux dominated World. > > I just started to wonder, will soon come the time when my patches will be > also refused with the "unsupported platform" comment?
Our soon-to-be-released roadmap has this to say on "supported platform": * Currency, i.e. a platform is widely deployed and in current use * Vendor support * Available to the dev team, i.e. the dev team have access to a suitable environment in which to test builds and deal with tickets and issues * Dev team ownership, i.e. at least one person on the team is willing to take some responsibility for a platform ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
