On 3 July 2014 14:13, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote: > However, in the kernel we are much more lax about who gets access to > the Coverity project. Part of this is the sure and certain knowledge > that the bad guys are quite willing to pay for a Coverity license, and > so for us the balance of increasing the pool of those can who are > looking through the Coverity scans, and contribute to fix bugs, and > thus grow the development community, tips in favor of being more open > about who gets access to Coverity.
Right, I agree, but clearly there isn't unanimity amongst the dev team. I think we'd be a bit more relaxed if we were actually on top of Coverity, which I would hope would happen soon, now we have full-time developer(s). ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
