Have you considered moving to CMake? It makes lots of the issues you discuss in the document just go away. cmake should work on the vast majority of supported operating systems, if not all of them ...
-----Original Message----- From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Mike Bland Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:24 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Single-Makefile Build Experiment report As announced on the openssl-testing list, I'm happy to report early, promising success in my Makefile refactoring experiment. Here's the short link to the Google Doc containing all of the details: http://goo.gl/yhvCno Feedback welcome. Regardless of the ultimate judgment of the experiment, I'm hoping to build upon this report and produce a published article. Questions: - Do these results provide acceptable justification for adopting this structure? (With the understanding that I may have to redo bits, of course.) - Provided the answer to the first question is "yes", should I do whatever necessary to support BSD make, or will establishing GNU make as a build requirement be acceptable? Thanks, Mike ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org ________________________________ This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
