On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Andy Polyakov via RT <r...@openssl.org> wrote: > Oops! Wrong patch! Correct one attached. If you feel like testing the > wrong one, go ahead, but there are some later non-essential adjustments. > > diff --git a/crypto/ec/ecp_nistz256.c b/crypto/ec/ecp_nistz256.c > index bf3fcc6..33b07ce 100644 > --- a/crypto/ec/ecp_nistz256.c > +++ b/crypto/ec/ecp_nistz256.c > @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static void ecp_nistz256_windowed_mul(const EC_GROUP * > group, > ecp_nistz256_point_double(&row[10 - 1], &row[ 5 - 1]); > ecp_nistz256_point_add (&row[15 - 1], &row[14 - 1], &row[1 - 1]); > ecp_nistz256_point_add (&row[11 - 1], &row[10 - 1], &row[1 - 1]); > - ecp_nistz256_point_add (&row[16 - 1], &row[15 - 1], &row[1 - 1]); > + ecp_nistz256_point_double(&row[16 - 1], &row[ 8 - 1]); > } > > index = 255;
I can believe that this fixes the issue, but it's just masking it, no? I'll see if I can track it down more precisely tomorrow. Cheers AGL ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org