> Sorry for responding late to this thread, but has anyone considered > consolidating the following three definitions: > OPENSSL_NO_EC > OPENSSL_NO_ECDH > OPENSSL_NO_EDDSA > Is there a valid case where all three of these wouldn't be used together? > Would the code even compile if only one (or two) of these were defined?
I would be happy to unify these, and you are probably right that the various mix and match options do not work. Does anyone here have issues or concerns if we do that? _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
