On 5.3.2015 18:27, Salz, Rich wrote:
Sorry for responding late to this thread, but has anyone considered
consolidating the following three definitions:
OPENSSL_NO_EC
OPENSSL_NO_ECDH
OPENSSL_NO_EDDSA
Is there a valid case where all three of these wouldn't be used together?
Would the code even compile if only one (or two) of these were defined?
I would be happy to unify these, and you are probably right that the various
mix and match options do not work.
Does anyone here have issues or concerns if we do that?
If you still keep the OPENSSL_NO_EC2M separate, then I do not have any
problem with this. However I would expect these three ifdefs to work -
of course with OPENSSL_NO_EC implying the NO_ECDH amd NO_ECDSA. Although
I did not try it myself.
Tomas Mraz
_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
