Hi Harri, This looks helpful for those writing unit tests.
It would be cool to have a similar thing for the unit test coverage. (https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Unit_Testing) - Andrejs > On 30.04.2015, at 17:50, Harri Porten <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > In case you are interested in seeing the condition/decision source code > coverage as achieved through the OpenSSL test suite: > > http://www.opencoverage.net/projects/openssl/index_html/sources.html > > We now regularly generate the reports from the tip of the master branch. In > the hope that it'll be useful for those touching and wanting to know how well > it is tested. > > Condition/decision coverage uncovers test combinations normally hidden in > line or statement coverage. Hence the much lower result of 29.6%. A long way > to go still :} > > Please let us know if you notice that we should extend the build or test > configuration to enable or run more components of the code. > > Some of the dead code findings may be harmless. Still, changes like the > attached one for b_sock.c will fix cases like > http://www.opencoverage.net/projects/openssl/index_html/source_565.html#line688 > and make the code more understandable at the same time. Maybe it's even an > unwanted leftover? > > Harri. > <b_sock.diff>_______________________________________________ > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
