Hi Harri, > We've compared the code coverage of the tests between the 1.0.2a release > and today's master state: it rose from 28.1% to 29.6%! I believe you did that by using your internal commercial product by Froglogic…
Any good free software alternative out there? Thanks, - Andrejs > On 04.05.2015, at 18:02, Harri Porten <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rich, > > On Fri, 1 May 2015, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> I am curious to see what the numbers look like from, say, yesterday compared >> to, roughly, early next week. > > We've compared the code coverage of the tests between the 1.0.2a release > and today's master state: it rose from 28.1% to 29.6%! > > And as you predicted the code simplifications might be responsible: the > number of decision points went down from 70192 to 67845. Which is good. > Provided that the software still does the same thing as before ;) > >> We are well into a huge overall edit that turns code like > If (p) free(p) >> Into >> free(p); >> And not just for free, but for several dozen OpenSSL functions. This will >> probably remove a couple of thousand decision points. The code certainly >> looks much simpler. > > Drilling down into the file changes of the last two weeks one can see > cases of the if()/free() simplification happening in untested code > however: > http://www.opencoverage.net/projects/openssl-diff/index_html/source_33.html > I'm not blaming anyone for that, though. Just pointing out the risk of > potentially unnoticed regressions. > > Harri. > > _______________________________________________ > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
