Hi Rich, It was my customer's request. I can ask them why:). Personally I think that it is a good idea to show what hardware is available and supported by openssl (even if maintained by a private party as a part of their SDK). Couple years ago I was looking for a good HSM with good openssl support. A centralized list would help a lot then.
Thank you, Alex. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > Most folks with crypto hardware usually include and maintain their ENGINE > manipulation as part of their SDK. Is there any reason why this approach > doesn't work here? > > -- > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz > _______________________________________________ > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev >
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
