Hello Viktor, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni < openssl-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:48:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:36:58PM +0300, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote: > > > > > > BTW, what does the OpenSSL Team plan regarding the GOST engine? > > > > I think some of us want to get rid of it, because it's rather > > crappy code. > > I think that if GOST is really going to be a supported set of > algorithms, then it should not be an engine, and should be integrated > properly, with robust well written and carefully reviewed code. > Well, if GOST algorithms become 1st-class citizens, it can solve some problems. I think it is possible to find some programmers (including me) who are ready to participate in this work. > > The current engine is IMHO not a good long-term vehicle for providing > GOST support to OpenSSL users. > Sure. For example, GOST94 signature algorithm is deprecated. But the current engine can be used to demonstrate the proper way to provide new algorithms through engine. Thank you! -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
