Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4178] [patch] OpenSSL 1.1.0 fails when configure with no-nextproto

[Salz, Rich via RT]

Should we support no-nextproto?
The #ifdef's complicate the code, and the implementation is very small.


_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev