In anycase, *NOT* just for me ! :-) I used it because it was available and I tried to avoid unneeded code in software.
-----Message d'origine----- De : Salz, Rich via RT [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : samedi 12 décembre 2015 16:09 À : [email protected] Cc : [email protected] Objet : RE: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4178] [patch] OpenSSL 1.1.0 fails when configure with no-nextproto Should we support no-nextproto? The #ifdef's complicate the code, and the implementation is very small. _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
