On Tuesday 12 January 2016 15:58:59 Viktor Dukhovni via RT wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Ole Tange via RT <r...@openssl.org> > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Rich Salz via RT <r...@openssl.org> wrote: > >> Fixed in bd4850df648bee9d8e0595b7e1147266e6f55a3e > > > > Great to see. > > > > May I suggest the bug also becomes a wish for support for > 2GB > > numbers, as that is what the user originally wanted? > > key=$(openssl rand -hex 16) > iv=$(openssl rand -hex 16) > cat /dev/zero | openssl enc -aes-128-cbc -K $key -iv $iv > > is a better way to produce a random stream of arbitrary length, > it is also hardware accelerated (AESNI) on many systems.
I would upgrade that to aes-128-ctr, but it's not bad per-se -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
