On Thursday 04 February 2016 13:08:15 Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > > That's all we get, a one-liner, no explanation, no rationale, > > response? > Take a look at some of the discussion here: > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/154 > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/148
You mean the "Many thanks for your patch. Applied"? :> If you see ways in which the code in proposed pull requests is unmaintainable, share them. Saying "we may not have resources later" is unconvincing. Especially given that we're talking just about a new mode created by combining already implemented cipher and integrity mechanism. Mode necessary to support an ENISA recommended cipher in TLSv1.3. -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
