"Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> skrev: (19 februari 2016 15:07:42 CET) > >> In both cases I would like to remove these engines from 1.1.0. I'd >like to hear >> from the community if there is any active use of these. One option if >there is >> found to be some small scale use is to spin out the engine into a >separately >> managed repo (as has happened recently with the GOST engine). > >Please do. I know Sander was interested in updating CHIL but never >found time. > >That also removes the last remaining need for "dynamic locks" huzzah
That should be removed either way. Engines should handle their own locks whatever way the programmer wants. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
