On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an > indicator?
Uh oh, is there a chance that the configury for 1.0.2 is NOT changed anymore? We have a set of local patches in the Cygwin distro which works around the missing pieces in 1.0.2 in a certain way, and changing the 1.0.2 branch now would break the build scripts for the Cygwin distro. I would very much prefer if people interested in OpenSSL 1.0.2 for Cygwin would use the openssl-1.0.2 source archive, which cotains all patches required for Cygwin, as well as the cygport build script to build openssl exactly the same way as in the Cygwin distro. Please let's not break that and stick to the master branch for the build system changes. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
