In message <20160222173404.gb11...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 
18:34:04 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> said:

vinschen> On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
vinschen> > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking 
detection of
vinschen> > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 
Cygwin from
vinschen> > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used 
as an
vinschen> > indicator?
vinschen> 
vinschen> Uh oh, is there a chance that the configury for 1.0.2 is NOT changed
vinschen> anymore?  We have a set of local patches in the Cygwin distro which
vinschen> works around the missing pieces in 1.0.2 in a certain way, and 
changing
vinschen> the 1.0.2 branch now would break the build scripts for the Cygwin 
distro.

A patch that fixes ./config was merged to the 1.0.2 branch earlier
today.  Commit 5c57fbb8ca991e8db7ce23174613898a27ca3fcb.  It's a
backport of the corresponding patch in master.  It's a very small
change, I'd be surprised if you can't edit that particular one from
your scripts.

1.0.2 is on long term support, see
http://openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html.  That means that
reasonable fixes might very well go in.  Sorry if that becomes a
bother.

-- 
Richard Levitte         levi...@openssl.org
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/
-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to