On Po, 2016-08-29 at 14:27 +0000, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > On Mon Aug 29 12:27:59 2016, appro wrote: > > > > Or maybe ("maybe" is reference to "I don't quite grasp" above) what > > we > > are talking about is Configure reading CFLAGS and LDFLAGS and > > *adding* > > them to generated Makefile. I mean we are not talking about passing > > them > > to 'make', but "freezing" them to their values at configure time. > > Could > > you clarify? > I assume, and please correct me if I'm wrong, that the request is to > treat the > environment variables CFLAGS and LDFLAGS the same way we treat CC, > i.e. as an > initial value to be used instead of what we get from the > configuration target > information. > > This should be quite easy to implement, and we can also continue to > use > whatever additional Configure arguments as compiler or linker flags > to be used > *in addition* to the initial value (that comes from the config target > information, or if we decide to implement it, CFLAGS)
Ideally the optimization/debugging flags not affecting directly the code that is being compiled would be replaced with what is placed into CFLAGS/LDFLAGS. But things like -D would be kept from the config target information. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb (You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.) -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4664 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev