On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 00:25 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 16:22 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > I'm guessing you mean this: > > > > https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TSS_Versio > > n_1.2_Level_1_FINAL.pdf > > > > ? It still doesn't tell you who the expected parent of the key > > would be, which is the problem I'm currently trying to solve. > > Right, in S3.23 ("Portable Data") or thereabouts. And yes, it doesn't > indicate the parent key. As discussed, the TssBlob structure there is > fairly pointless which is presumably why the TPM ENGINE didn't use > it, and just dumped the actual blob (which I later put into an > OCTET_STRING in the PEM files, IIRC). > > I was hoping that the TPM 2.0 spec would fix that, maybe?
Not far enough through it yet to be definitive, but I don't think so ... there's even more parent like seeds in it. James
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
