On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:52:50PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I had not realized that we just increased the “entropy” requirements by 50%,
> from 256 to 384. The original DRBG submission that I did only required 128
> bits. I think that is wrong, and I think the PR that did it (#5503) should
> be reverted.
> I am concerned that we are trying to meet requirements that we really don’t
> have. The original code was a huge improvement.
> Requiring 384 bits of random seed is silly. I think it is ridiculous. One
> way or another we HAVE to fix that before the release.
Please note that that 50% extra is only used for instantiating the
DRBG. On reseed we it only uses 256 bits.
There is an alternative to that 50% extra, but it's not making
sense to me.
The 1.1.0 version also used 256 bit.
openssl-project mailing list