> On Apr 4, 2018, at 4:32 AM, Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote:
> 
> The fix itself is easy (just add a line saying 'CPP=$(CC) -E'), and
> that's not what I'm here to talk about, but rather how we want to act
> in cases like this.  Do we make a new release?  Do we create an
> official patch?  Do we make a link to the corrective github PR?
> My own sense is that we should put up something, and it should be
> visible on our download page and in our source archives.
> 
> Whatever we decide should become policy.

I'd reissue an updated tarball as openssl-1.1.0h-u1.tar.gz,
where "u1" is "update 1".  This changes only a build bug,
not the code, so I'm tempted to keep the release name still
1.1.0h and not bump to 1.1.0i.d

-- 
        Viktor.

_______________________________________________
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Reply via email to