>    Part of the idea was that this would be a means of communication
    between application and provider, just like controls are with
    libcrypto sub-systems.

I can probably find the email thread (or maybe it was a GitHub comment on my 
proposal for params), where you said, quite definitively, that this was *not* a 
general-purpose mechanism but rather a way to expose the necessary internals 
for opaque objects like RSA keys.

What changed your mind?

Perhaps not surprisingly, I agree with Shane's assessment and am strongly 
opposed to the project foisting this on everyone at this time.  @DavidBen, your 

Reply via email to