Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote:
> There are many red herrings in here, and I would argue that trying to
> be too uniform in the way you think about all functions may be
> harmful, because not all functions are classified the same.
> We cannot deny that many of our interfaces have an OOP flair. We may
> be programming in C, but we very obviously have that kind of pattern,
> a "poor man's OOP" in C. So speaking about our interfaces in OOP
> terms is not far fetched, as long as we keep in mind that we can only
> take the argument so far.
It would be very nice if there was object-focused (rather than "oriented")
documentation for OpenSSL.
Tell me what all the structures/typedefs are, and then tell me what things
operate on them.
(I tried to start documentation like that for the CMS parts, but I got
distracted.)
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
