On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 19:18 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:35:02AM +0000, Matt Caswell wrote: > > topic: Accept PR #16705 into 3.0 subject to the normal review > > process > > -1 > > From what I understand, this breaks our provider API. Providers > that work with 3.0.0 will not work when that PR is applied, and > providers that do the same implementation as that PR will not work > with 3.0.0. That might be something that can be fixed in the PR. > > We might want to make changes like that, but we clearly need better > rules for when it's acceptable to make such change, and how to make > sure it's compatible.
Kurt, can you please explain why do you think this breaks the provider API compatibility with 3.0.0? I do not see any such breakage possible from the PR. -- Tomáš Mráz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb [You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your conscience.]
