>[not setting Reply-To]
>
> > But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
> > members.
>
>The amount of such "accidents" like this one or the vacation mail
>disaster that seems to hit this list every few weeks is much more
>than on any other high-volume list that I know. I think the break-
>even point between convenient replies and preventing this stuff has
>been reached and I would also vote for disabling the Reply-To
>function!
I'm on another list, where emails are set up to Reply-To the list,
and we *never* see any auto-reply, virus warnings, could-not-deliver,
or any other spurious auto-generated mails. And it's been that way
for years, so I doubt the listadmin is coming up with new filters for
each new objectionable email. I'll get in touch with the listadmin
and ask how he does it.
Tom Biggs
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
