>>>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:00:01 -0700,
>>>>> Caliban Tiresias Darklock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ctd) writes:
ctd> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:33:18 +0200, Michael Ströder
ctd> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
>> address to the list address. IMHO this should be changed to reduce
>> such problems with automatic replies (vacation e-mails, virus-scans
>> etc.).
ctd> But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
ctd> members.
What we do is send the notice to the envelope sender, which
typically is set to the list owner. (Sorry list owner.) At least
that way it doesn't flood the entire list time and time again....
--
Amos
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
