David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 03 Feb 2003 19:01:53 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >Tim Regovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>*always* operate in non blocking mode. The code may
> >>be slightly more complex but will *always* work
> >>better.
>
> >I don't agree with this. Getting non-blocking code correct
> >with OpenSSL is quite tricky. If you don't need non-blocking,
> >there's no reason to do it.
>
> You nearly always need non-blocking, even if it's just for timeouts.
Depends. If you're just setting some global timeout, you
can use blocking I/O perfectly well.
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.rtfm.com/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
