David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 03 Feb 2003 22:00:08 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> >David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>You nearly always need non-blocking, even if it's just for
> >>timeouts.
>
> >Depends. If you're just setting some global timeout, you
> >can use blocking I/O perfectly well.
>
> There will almost always be race conditions involving exactly when
> the signal was received or the timeout occured.
Are you saying that setsockopt(SO_RCVTIMEO) is broken?
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.rtfm.com/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
