Forgot to mention that perhaps your client does not understand HTTP 1.1? Check whether the redirect request came back to the server.
> Hi Pankaj., > > This difference in the HTTP response header is very critical. > It influences the way in which the Client is going to behave. > > In case of 1, as the "Connection: Close" header is sent as part of the > response, the http server will initiate the tcp teardown and need not > bother sending the content length of the application payload. > > In case of 2, the client is expected to keep the HTTP connection alive, so > that perhaps subsequent http requests can be pipelined, this is a feature > of HTTP1.1. > > when a 302 is sent from the server, it means that either a "REDIRECT" req > needs to be sent by the client as the "http resource" is not available in > the requested path, so this redirect url will be as part of the "Redirect" > header of the HTTP response, also as the connection keep alive has been > set, the redirect request from the client will have to go on the same tcp > connection over which the 302 was got, which is not supported by your ssl > server? > > Thanks > --Gayathri > > When I tried to print the values returned by BIO_read it shows > > -1, 8, 12, 30, 24, 79, 407, 47, 10, 2, 61, 2, 3, 2, 80, 2, 2, -1, -1, > -1......... , -1 > > I tried to catch the error using perror which shows the error message > "Error 0" till the return value 2, after that "Resource temporarily > unavailable" for all "-1" returned values. > > If you want to see code then let me know. > > > > > > On 12/28/05, Pankaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am quite new for the OpenSSL programming. I am using Perl client >> program and C client program for connecting to the same server. >> >> Perl script works fine with the get_https request. But in C, I am >> getting "-1" return value from the server while reading. >> >> C program implimentation is same as of sslcat method of SSLeay.pm >> module. >> >> I tried to differentiate between the reply header and found that there >> is only single difference between them as : >> >> Perl client script: >> CONNECTION: close >> >> C Script: >> HTTP/1.1 302 Found >> Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive >> Connection: Keep-Alive >> >> i.e. 2 extra lines with difference in Connection header. Rest of the >> returned header content is same for both. I am not understanding that >> if server is getting connected for the Perl script (which uses >> Net::SSLeay::get_https() method), then what is the problem with the C >> code? >> >> While debugging I found that it getting connected, accepts request and >> replys back with the series of chunks (in BIO_read), but it seems that >> it is not ending (no "0" return). contineously it is giving "-1". >> >> >> I am using openssl-0.9.7g version. If you require code then I will >> provide in next email. >> >> Any help in this regard will greatly appreciated. >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Pankaj Solanki >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> "The Price of Greatness is responsibility over each of your thoughts" >> > > > -- > Best Regards, > Pankaj Solanki > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ph : 09810823740. > > "The Price of Greatness is responsibility over each of your thoughts" > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
