Sander Temme wrote:
/opt/nfast/toolkits/openssl/openssl098e-patch.txt
I found a 'openssl098-patch.txt' is that ok ?
Should apply cleanly to newer versions of OpenSSL, with patch -p1. It creates a static lock for CHIL to use so it doesn't need the dynamic ones available.
It did.
I personally think the dynamic locking concept is more elegant, but I do agree it smells of duplicated code because everyone has to set up the same scaffolding.
Yes, I agree. Callbacks are really elegant (but a pain to debug!). And I think that a default function that would fit most users would be nice.. :D I just installed the patched version - but no changes in the behavior.. I will try to inspect the `disable_mutex_callbacks`.. but if that is the case, how shall I fix it ??? Later, Max ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
