Hi Geoff,

that would be amazing.. I agree with you.. if there were more hours in
the day... hehehe...

The patch from Sanders looks ok to me... :D It can actually help in
understanding better the option...

Later,
Max


Geoff Thorpe wrote:
As I stated in another post, I'm looking to overhaul the way certain "infrastructure" is setup - ie. right now; static locks, dynamic locks, memory allocation, thread IDs, ex_data, [...] are all specified independently - despite the fact they often need to be mutually-compatible. So I'm looking at combining these into "platforms". My motivation is async-crypto, which requires additional infrastructure that adds to the mutual-compatibility requirements. In doing so, it'll be easier to provide pre-packaged platforms that include plug-in implementations for these things (eg. a pthreads platform, win32 platform, whatever). It should also be possible to specify default platforms from the Configure target, without limiting application ability to override.

If only there were more hours in the day ...

Do you agree with Sander's patch suggestion? If so, I'll put that into 0.9.8-stable and HEAD.

Cheers,
Geoff



--

Best Regards,

        Massimiliano Pala

--o------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dartmouth Computer Science Dept               Home Phone: +1 (603) 369-9332
PKI/Trust Laboratory                          Work Phone: +1 (603) 646-9179
--o------------------------------------------------------------------------

People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us
who do.
                                                           -- Isaac Asimov

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to