On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Jakob Bohm <jb-open...@wisemo.com> wrote: > On 13-07-2010 15:00, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> [SNIP] >>> proponents of the RSA and DH algorithms said that the >>> number was wildly exaggerated and proposed some much >>> smaller values. >> >> I'm not willing to go out on a limb a recommend a smaller moduli (what >> is RSA recommending, BTW?). I look at it this way: When DSS was >> proposed, RSA Data Securities lobbied hard to get an RSA Signature >> included. They can't win them all.... >> > > Yes, that mostly dead company lost the political lobbying battle against > Certicom, but I was asking about science, not politics. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=integer+factorization+estimate&as_sdt=20000000&as_ylo=2008&as_vis=0 > [SNIP] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
