On Wed May 4 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Wed May 4 2011, Mounir IDRASSI wrote:
> > 
> > Well, this is not quiet adapted to the situation. OpenSSL is a library 
> > and it doesn't spawn any process. Moreover, the issue is with the 
> > internal builtin RNG of OpenSSL and a simple user of OpenSSL can not 
> > change its implementation.
> > Apart from a change to OpenSSL internal, the only option is to implement 
> > an engine that exports its own RNG implementation through a custom 
> > RAND_METHOD structure.
> > 
> 
> Since the OP is running win-7, that probably means an Intel processor
> that supports SSE2 (P-4 or newer) instructions.
> 
> Depending on the OP requirements for a cryptographically 'hard' RNG -
> this may help (as one of the random components):
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/fast-random-number-generator-on-the-intel-pentiumr-4-processor/
> 

Also check out the linked-to page in the comments of that one:
http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/SFMT/index.html

Mike
> Mike
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Mounir IDRASSI
> > IDRIX
> > http://www.idrix.fr
> > 
> > 
> > On 5/4/2011 7:02 PM, carlyo...@keycomm.co.uk wrote:
> > > Start second process as a daemon so it only does the entropy gathering 
> > > at process start-up?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *On Wed 04/05/11 5:35 PM , Mounir IDRASSI mounir.idra...@idrix.net sent:
> > > *
> > >
> > >
> > >     Indeed, their have been already a modification to OpenSSL in order to
> > >     limit the observed delay but that doesn't completely solve the
> > >     problem.
> > >     This issue is linked to an internal design of OpenSSL which uses heap
> > >     walking as a mean to gather entropy and unfortunately Windows 7 have
> > >     made this mechanism more expensive than previous Windows versions.
> > >     So,
> > >     this issue won't be solved unless there is a major change to OpenSSL
> > >     entropy gathering architecture, which doesn't appear to be coming any
> > >     time soon.
> > >
> > >     Cheers,
> > >     --
> > >     Mounir IDRASSI
> > >     IDRIX
> > >     http://www.idrix.fr
> > >
> > >     On 5/4/2011 6:14 PM, Ashwin Chandra wrote:
> > >     > Okay I read the complete bug report and it looks like there is a
> > >     fix in
> > >     > the latest openssl. However I checked it out and it limits the
> > >     maximum
> > >     > time RAND_poll will take to a second. 1000ms. Is there any other
> > >     way to
> > >     > speed this up?
> > >     >
> > >     > -----Original Message-----
> > >     > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org>
> > >     > [owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org>] On Behalf Of Mounir IDRASSI
> > >     > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:47 AM
> > >     > To: openssl-users@openssl.org <mailto:openssl-users@openssl.org>
> > >     > Subject: Re: RSA_private_decrypt across processes
> > >     >
> > >     > Hi,
> > >     >
> > >     > This could be related to the slowness of RAND_poll under Windows
> > >     7. See
> > >     > :
> > >     > 
> > > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2100&user=guest&pass=guest 
> > > <http://webmail.keycomm.co.uk/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Frt.openssl.org%2FTicket%2FDisplay.html%3Fid%3D2100%26user%3Dguest%26pass%3Dguest>
> > >     > Your second process is certainly trying to initialize its RNG and
> > >     that's
> > >     > why you see this delay.
> > >     > Do you confirm that you are executing these processes under
> > >     Windows 7?
> > >     >
> > >     > --
> > >     > Mounir IDRASSI
> > >     > IDRIX
> > >     > http://www.idrix.fr
> > >     
> > > <http://webmail.keycomm.co.uk/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.idrix.fr>
> > >     >
> > >     > On 5/4/2011 7:02 AM, Ashwin Chandra wrote:
> > >     >> I generate an RSA key using RSA_generate_key in one process. I then
> > >     >> take the RSA structure that is generated and serialize it and
> > >     send it
> > >     >> to another process via an RPC mechanism. In the other process I 
> > > then
> > >     >> de-serialize the RSA data and use that as input to an
> > >     >> RSA_private_decrypt function to decrypt some data that was
> > >     previously
> > >     >> encrypted with the RSA public key.
> > >     >>
> > >     >> This works fine and I am able to decrypt the data successful,
> > >     HOWEVER,
> > >     >> it takes a long time to do so, like up to 2 seconds. It is almost 
> > > as
> > >     >> if it is doing another key generation in the background. Note
> > >     that if
> > >     >> I do this RSA_private_decrypt in the same process as the one that
> > >     >> generated the key, it takes around 20-30 ms.
> > >     >>
> > >     >> This leads me to think that maybe there is some static data that 
> > > the
> > >     >> openssl library uses in RSA_private_decrypt that was cached when I
> > >     >> generated the key and now is not available since it is a new
> > >     process.
> > >     >>
> > >     >> Can anyone enlighten me on this?
> > >     >>
> > >     > 
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > >     > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> > >     
> > > <http://webmail.keycomm.co.uk/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openssl.org>
> > >     > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:openssl-users@openssl.org>
> > >     > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:majord...@openssl.org>
> > >     >
> > >     >
> > >     > 
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > >     > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> > >     
> > > <http://webmail.keycomm.co.uk/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openssl.org>
> > >     > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:openssl-users@openssl.org>
> > >     > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:majord...@openssl.org>
> > >
> > >     ______________________________________________________________________
> > >     OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> > >     User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:openssl-users@openssl.org>
> > >     Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
> > >     <mailto:majord...@openssl.org>
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> > User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> > Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org
> 
> 


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to