On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Prashanth kumar N <prashanth.kuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeff.. this is good idea... so are you going to start one? No, this is something best left to the OpenSSL project. Otherwise, you'll have a bunch of fractured documentation sprayed all over the web.
Jeff > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Ken Goldman <kgold...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> > On 3/27/2012 3:51 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/27/2012 9:37 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: >> >>> >> >>> You should really be using EVP instead of the low level routines. >> >>> They are well documented with examples. >> >> >> >> Where, precisely? >> >> >> >> I didn't find it either when I was looking a few years ago, so I >> >> settled on the obvious low level APIs too. >> > >> > >> > In fact, neither the low level or the EVP APIs are documented. I don't >> > see >> > any AES documentation at all. >> Perhaps its time to bring up a wiki style documentation (again). >> >> Under wiki, users who get get frustrated enough about lack of/dated >> documentation can spend some time copy/pasting code in between <pre> >> tags. >> >> It would also relieve the docmaster from updating the current >> documentation. He or she could approve wiki account requests instead. >> >> Wiki style documentation has worked well for other similar libraries, >> such as OWASP ESAPI and Crypto++. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
