Hi Richard, On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote: > In message > <CANt7B+feUe2W7627Nrw5bVOnZ1Wb5uQ4z57=ry9lwe7d0b2...@mail.gmail.com> on Thu, > 15 Sep 2016 12:17:12 +0200, Kim Gräsman <kim.gras...@gmail.com> said: > > kim.grasman> I'm looking at integrating OpenSSL 1.1 in our tree, and I > noticed the > kim.grasman> Windows build system now produces decorated lib names. > > For DLLs, yes. > > kim.grasman> The general pattern seems to be lib<name>_<ver>[-<arch>].lib > where > kim.grasman> <arch> is only appended for 64-bit builds. > > Are you sure? Looking at my builds, I find libcrypto-1_1.dll and > libssl-1_1.dll with the import libraries libcrypto.lib and > libssl.lib.
Ahem. I *was* sure, but with a clean build, I can see you're absolutely right. I must have mixed up the DLL names and import lib names at some point. Sorry about the confusion! - Kim -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
