Hi Richard,

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote:
> In message 
> <CANt7B+feUe2W7627Nrw5bVOnZ1Wb5uQ4z57=ry9lwe7d0b2...@mail.gmail.com> on Thu, 
> 15 Sep 2016 12:17:12 +0200, Kim Gräsman <kim.gras...@gmail.com> said:
> kim.grasman> I'm looking at integrating OpenSSL 1.1 in our tree, and I 
> noticed the
> kim.grasman> Windows build system now produces decorated lib names.
> For DLLs, yes.
> kim.grasman> The general pattern seems to be lib<name>_<ver>[-<arch>].lib 
> where
> kim.grasman> <arch> is only appended for 64-bit builds.
> Are you sure?  Looking at my builds, I find libcrypto-1_1.dll and
> libssl-1_1.dll with the import libraries libcrypto.lib and
> libssl.lib.

Ahem. I *was* sure, but with a clean build, I can see you're absolutely right.

I must have mixed up the DLL names and import lib names at some point.

Sorry about the confusion!

- Kim
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Reply via email to