Any reason for not just calling it "OpenStack Commons"? Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hey > >The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The >"official title" is new. > > Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries > PTL: Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> > Mission Statement: > To produce a set of python libraries containing infrastructure code > shared by OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by these libraries > should be high quality, stable, consistent and generally applicable. > >I did consider explicitly mentioning technical debt with something like: > > Mission Statement: > To tackle copy-and-paste technical debt in OpenStack by producing a > set of python libraries containing infrastructure code shared by > OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by these libraries should be > high quality, stable, consistent and generally applicable. > >But for wholly new code, that sounds like you need to introduce >copy-and-paste technical debt before it can be considered in scope for >Oslo :) > >Cheers, >Mark. > > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
