On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey > > The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The > "official title" is new. > > Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries > PTL: Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> > Mission Statement: > To produce a set of python libraries containing infrastructure code > shared by OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by these libraries > should be high quality, stable, consistent and generally applicable. > +1 What sort of code would not be "infrastructure" but would be "shared by OpenStack projects"? Is the "infrastructure" redundant? Doug > > I did consider explicitly mentioning technical debt with something like: > > Mission Statement: > To tackle copy-and-paste technical debt in OpenStack by producing a > set of python libraries containing infrastructure code shared by > OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by these libraries should be > high quality, stable, consistent and generally applicable. > > But for wholly new code, that sounds like you need to introduce > copy-and-paste technical debt before it can be considered in scope for > Oslo :) > > Cheers, > Mark. > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
