+1 for Ollie.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Avishay Traeger <avis...@il.ibm.com> wrote: > "Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.bor...@hp.com> wrote on 07/18/2013 12:04:07 > AM: > <snip> > > +1 to Ollie from me. > > > > +1 to John's points. If a company is colluding with other core > > members, from the same company, to do bad things within a project, > > it should become pretty obvious at some point and the project's > > community should take action. If someone is putting in an extra > > effort to provide quality code and reviews on a regular basis, then > > why wouldn't we want that person on the team? Besides, being a core > > member really just means that you are required to do reviews and > > help out with the community. You do get some gerrit privileges for > > reviews, but that's about it. I for one think that we absolutely > > can use more core members to help out with reviews during the > > milestone deadlines :) > > Walt, > As I said, I really wasn't worried about anyone colluding or doing bad > things. As you said, that would be obvious and could be handled. I was > concerned about creating a limited view, and I thank you and everyone who > replied for easing those concerns. > > And BTW, I don't think there is an HP conspiracy to take over Cinder and > make it FC-only :) > > Thanks, > Avishay > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Regards Huang Zhiteng
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
