On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net>wrote:
> Note specifically the citation of 200-400 lines as the knee of the review > effectiveness curve: that's lower than I thought - I thought 200 was > clearly fine - but no. > This is really interesting. I wish they would have explicitly defined "lines of code." Is that "git show |wc -l"? Just the new lines which were added? The sum of the lines changed, removed and added? You can get vastly different numbers depending on how you count it.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
