Alessandro Pilotti wrote: > On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org >> The other two alternatives are to accept the delays and work within Nova >> (slowly building the trust that will give you more autonomy), or ship it >> as a separate add-on that does not come with nova-core's signature on it. > > I never asked for a nova signature on it. My only requirerement is that > the project would be part of OpenStack and not an external project, even > if this means passing 2 releases in incubation on stackforge as long as > it can become part of the OpenStack core group of projects afterwards > (if it meets the required OpenStack criteria of course). > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
That's a possible outcome of the second alternative I described above. The separate add-on could apply to the incubation track and potentially be made a part of the integrated release. My rant was in answer to Vish's "adopt something more similar to the linux model when dealing with subsystems" suggestion, where the autonomous subsystem is still made part of "Nova" in the end, and therefore carries nova-core's signature. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
